设为首页         

资讯内容 Content

CIBIS III研究:慢性心力衰竭患者初始接受依那普利而后用比索洛尔,或初始接受比索洛尔后再用依那普利对比的生存和住院疗效分析
Effect on Survival and Hospitalization of Initiating Treatment for Chronic Heart Failure With Bisoprolol Followed by Enalapril, as Compared With the Opposite Sequence Results of the Randomized Cardiac Insufficiency Bisoprolol Study
国际循环网版权所有,谢绝任何形式转载,侵犯版权者必予法律追究。

 编辑:国际循环网 时间:2005/9/9 0:00:00    加入收藏
 关键字:CIBIS III 

Background—In patients with chronic heart failure (CHF), a β-blocker is generally added to a regimen containing an angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) inhibitor. It is unknown whether β-blockade as initial therapy may be as useful.

Methods and Results—
We randomized 1010 patients with mild to moderate CHF and left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35%, who were not receiving ACE inhibitor, β-blocker, or angiotensin receptor blocker therapy, to open-label monotherapy with either bisoprolol (target dose 10 mg QD; n=505) or enalapril (target dose 10 mg BID; n=505) for 6 months, followed by their combination for 6 to 24 months. The 2 strategies were blindly compared with regard to the combined primary end point of all-cause mortality or hospitalization and with regard to each of these end point components individually. Bisoprolol-first treatment was noninferior to enalapril-first treatment if the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI) for the absolute between-group difference was < 5%, corresponding to a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.17. In the intention-to-treat sample, the primary end point occurred in 178 patients allocated to bisoprolol-first treatment versus 186 allocated to enalapril-first treatment (absolute difference -1.6%, 95% CI -7.6 to 4.4%, HR 0.94; 95% CI 0.77 to 1.16). In the per-protocol sample, 163 patients allocated to bisoprolol-first treatment had a primary end point, versus 165 allocated to enalapril-first treatment (absolute difference -0.7%, 95% CI -6.6 to 5.1%, HR 0.97; 95% CI 0.78 to 1.21). With bisoprolol-first treatment, 65 patients died, versus 73 with enalapril-first treatment (HR 0.88; 95% CI 0.63 to 1.22), and 151 versus 157 patients were hospitalized (HR 0.95; 95% CI 0.76 to 1.19).

Conclusion—Although noninferiority of bisoprolol-first versus enalapril-first treatment was not proven in the per-protocol analysis, our results indicate that it may be as safe and efficacious to initiate treatment for CHF with bisoprolol as with enalapril.

相关幻灯:CIBIS III

PDF全文:PDF

   评论发言          

相关幻灯

相关视频

 
京ICP备15014970号-5   国际循环 版权所有  2008-2022 icirculation.com  All Rights Reserved